Hey Nuno, how are things? It’s great to hear from you 🙂
That sounds to me like an interesting question that we can maybe play a game around to see what everyone thinks (hmm) The way to describe the Respect Game generally depends on the audience because it can be explained in multiple different altitudes of complexity. I think it’s important to not go into details if that person/group is not so familiar with the onchain world, while providing sufficient information about the key components of this amazing game. Describing what the purpose of the game can be and how it can be played are the two major categories to be competent about in my opinion. A good option is to freestyle the rest depending on the audience engagement and customize it for their specific use case. A simple blurb about the Respect Game is that it’s a way to signal an opinion and rank each other’s work in a collaborative weekly meeting format. A good resource about the Respect game can be found in this living
curated by
@Dan Singjoy
, which we can keep on refining. I’m interested to hear how everyone else will describe the Respect Game?