Future Citizenship Selection Criteria - Retro Funding Missions 🔴 - Optimism Collective

https://gov.optimism.io/t/future-citizenship-selection-criteria/6558/20

image2534×1884 392 KB

image1478×992 94.2 KB

I know this Future Citizenship Selection Criteria has been here before now, nevertheless i feel to make my input anywhere;

1. Alignment with Optimism’s Vision

• Feedback: Ensure the criteria reflect Optimism’s commitment to public goods, governance, and retroactive public goods funding (RPGF). Highlight specific actions or contributions demonstrating alignment with these principles.
• Suggestion: Incorporate a scoring system or qualitative review based on an applicant’s involvement in RPGF-aligned activities or projects.

1. Inclusivity and Diversity

• Feedback: The process should actively include underrepresented voices in Web3 and encourage participation from diverse geographies and demographics.

*Suggestion:Include a criterion to assess applicants’ potential to bring unique perspectives or bridge gaps in the ecosystem.

1. Past Contributions

• Feedback: Prioritize applicants who have verifiable contributions to Optimism or similar ecosystems. Contributions should include both technical (e.g., code commits) and non-technical (e.g., community education) efforts.

*Suggestion: Use on-chain activity, governance participation, or community feedback as evidence of contributions.

1. Community Engagement

• Feedback: Future citizens should have demonstrated an ability to foster collaboration and build within communities.

*Suggestion: Ask applicants to provide examples of community initiatives they’ve led or participated in, emphasizing outcomes and impact.

1. Long-Term Commitment

• Feedback: Ensure that applicants are not just short-term speculators but committed to growing Optimism over time.

*Suggestion: Include a question about the applicant’s vision for their role in the collective and a pledge for continued involvement.

1. Scalability and Feasibility

• Feedback: The selection process should be scalable to accommodate growth without compromising quality.

*Suggestion: Implement a tiered approach where initial rounds are automated (e.g, weighted scoring) and final selections involve qualitative evaluation by community representatives or stewards.

1. Transparency and Feedback

• Feedback: Transparency in the selection process is critical to build trust in the collective.

*Suggestion: Publish anonymized selection metrics and reasoning for acceptance or rejection. Offer constructive feedback to rejected applicants to encourage future applications.

1. Dynamic Updates

• Feedback: The selection criteria should evolve as the Optimism ecosystem matures and adapts to new challenges.

*Suggestion: Create a periodic review mechanism where the community can propose and vote on changes to the criteria.