Individual contribution logs represent a record of an individuals contribution efforts.
Iām just sharing the analysis for feedback at the moment but if I went down the path of trying to developer something for this suggestion iād look to collaborate with anyone in the industry that was interested! My telegram is Telegram: Contact @georgelovegrove 1 if you wanted to chat there about your community
sinaya
Yes, healthy competition and aligned incentives! The less accurate the contribution logs are the harder it will be to group people by skill level so the more broad the groupings would be. You would expect this at the beginning in the early days of the tooling and processes. However even broad bucket groupings can still be useful just for identifying the bad actors or poor performers. The community can then more easily respond to that information. I also love the idea of contributors being able to use different skill sets or work across ideas more freely which can be difficult with idea token focused models where compensation agreements realistically need to be made with every new project that a contributor wants to help with.
lovegrovegeorge
Individual contribution logs represent a record of an individuals contribution efforts.
Liliop.eth
Hey @Liliop.eth, so the Ethereum Attestation service could be used in the type of system being suggested here. There could be a number of systems for helping people to automatically record digital contributions and manual submission processes. Then the EAS could enable people to make attestations about those contributions to add more evidence and clarity about them.
Iām just sharing the analysis for feedback at the moment but if I went down the path of trying to developer something for this suggestion iād look to collaborate with anyone in the industry that was interested! My telegram is Telegram: Contact @georgelovegrove 1 if you wanted to chat there about your community
sinaya
Yes, healthy competition and aligned incentives! The less accurate the contribution logs are the harder it will be to group people by skill level so the more broad the groupings would be. You would expect this at the beginning in the early days of the tooling and processes. However even broad bucket groupings can still be useful just for identifying the bad actors or poor performers. The community can then more easily respond to that information. I also love the idea of contributors being able to use different skill sets or work across ideas more freely which can be difficult with idea token focused models where compensation agreements realistically need to be made with every new project that a contributor wants to help with.
lovegrovegeorge